4 Comments
Mar 5, 2021Liked by Neal Moore

I agree that it should be put up to the voters.

Expand full comment
Mar 5, 2021Liked by Neal Moore

I agree that it should be put up to the voters. I’ve been emailing city council members as I found out that although one of aldermen seemed to give the impression that Cabot and Little Rock were “getting along just fine” with their policies. In fact, they are much more restrictive. Although the ban is lifted in Cabot, they require registration of any pit bull breeds, as well as photos taken with owners, microchips implanted, stickers on windows alerting people there is a pit bull in the residence, requirements that owners provide at least $300,000 in liability insurance, sterilization, etc. As I read it, Maumelle’s only requires $100,000 liability insurance which as one aldermen stated won’t come near the hospital costs and reconstructive surgery expenses for children and adults attacked. Little Rock’s policies are more restrictive as well and mirror the policies of Cabot far more than the ones proposed in Maumelle. I don’t think enough thought and research has been applied in the creation of this ordinance.

Expand full comment

Let's encourage the council to come together for the greater good and put the ban question to the voters next May. They can amend ordinances later and work out the policies and procedures on implementation after the election. Other cities have voted on this issue. Why can't we?

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing about Drama Kids!

Expand full comment